Democracy is not a spectator sport...
What was witnessed on January 8th, 2026, at the special meeting of the SLBC in Douglas, was meaningful public participation, a requirement of our laws and rules, and the pillar of self-governance. Though long overdue regarding the wind leases on state land and the Pronghorn project as a whole, the overwhelming turnout in person coupled with more than 100 viewing online made clear that we, the public, are engaged.
Testimony came from a diverse range of voices—including students, contractors, energy-industry workers, elected officials, ranchers and many more. For those that were unable to attend or watch, it is important to know that peaceful, educated, heartfelt public participation made a difference. And most importantly, remember you are not alone. Thousands have signed the petition, came to meetings and/or spread the word through family and friends. Yesterday was inspiring, but there is more to be done.
Thank you again to everyone who has signed, shared, and shown up—this momentum is because of you. At the same time, the fight isn’t over. We need to keep signing, keep sharing accurate information, and keep showing up—at meetings, in public comment opportunities, and wherever local voices need to be heard.
in focus
Petition Results (So Far...)
Petition Results (So Far...)
Petition Results (So Far...)
Glenrock-area participation now rivals recent voter turnout. Get the updated breakdown and sign the petition.
History of Title 18-5
Petition Results (So Far...)
Petition Results (So Far...)
What changed in Title 18-5 from 1957 to now—and why does it matter?
Title 18-5
Petition Results (So Far...)
Title 18-5
Can Converse County Commissioners stop the Pronghorn H2 Project? Yes.
IMPLAN
Letter to the Editor
Title 18-5
Do the economic promises, as measured by IMPLAN, actually reflect the full reality for Converse County citizens?
Groupthink
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
How Developer and Government Groupthink Threaten Project Integrity and Community Trust
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor: Hidden costs in 'green' energy promises, power, path of least resistance
The Real Irony
When developers push, government stays silent, and citizens are left out - who's really guilty of overreach?
Fiduciary Responsibility
Fiduciary responsibility is a legal and ethical duty to act in the best interest of others. It is not solely about money.
A Call for Accountability: Local Government Must Do Better
As the Pronghorn H2 Project advances toward development, the role of local government — including elected officials, planning boards, and regulatory agencies — has come under increasing scrutiny. Community members, landowners, and concerned residents are calling for greater transparency, stronger oversight, and meaningful public engagement before any further steps are taken.
Fiduciary Responsibility: It's Not Just About Money
The Pronghorn H2 Project is more than a development proposal — it’s a measure of whether our elected officials are willing to uphold their fiduciary responsibility. This means acting in the best interest of the people by carefully considering all impacts of the project — not just financial projections. Approving the Pronghorn H2 Project without full transparency, independent analysis, and a commitment to long-term public well-being is a violation of that duty.
Fiduciary responsibility is not a formality.
It’s a promise to serve the people first. And that promise is on the line.
Rushed Decisions, Lasting Consequences
The speed at which some local officials have embraced the Pronghorn H2 Project has raised red flags. Critical decisions, such as leasing public land and endorsing complex infrastructure, have been made with minimal input from the people most affected. These choices will have decades-long consequences for our environment, our property values, our water resources, and the safety of our communities.
Why is there such urgency to greenlight a project with so many unanswered questions?
Transparency Is Not Optional
Residents deserve honest, thorough, and accessible information. So far, the details about water sourcing, environmental impact, safety risks, economic projections, and long-term planning have been vague or withheld entirely. Without full transparency from both developers and local leadership, trust erodes — and with it, the integrity of the decision-making process.
Elected officials have a duty to represent the interests of their constituents, not fast-track deals for private developers behind closed doors.
Who Bears the Risk?
Local taxpayers will be left to deal with the aftermath if this project underperforms or fails — including costs related to emergency services, road maintenance, environmental damage, and property devaluation. If the project proves unviable or unsafe, will there be funds for cleanup and decommissioning? Will communities be compensated for lost tax revenue and reduced property values?
These questions remain unanswered. And that’s unacceptable.
Rebuild Trust Through Action
Accountability begins with listening. It continues with transparency, independent impact assessments, and the courage to say no when the risks outweigh the rewards. We are calling on all government leaders to:
- Pause approvals and leases until full public hearings and third-party impact studies are completed.
- Disclose all agreements, environmental assessments, and financial incentives related to the project.
- Commit to representing community voices — not just corporate interests.
- Protect our region’s environmental integrity, cultural heritage, and economic interests of the taxpayer.
Our Future, Not Just Their Project
The Pronghorn H2 Project is more than a development proposal — it’s a defining moment for how we govern, protect, and preserve the future of our community. Local government must rise to the occasion and prove that the people — not profits — are their highest priority.
We are not anti-progress.
We are pro-transparency, pro-environment, and pro-community. And we are watching.
Who We are
We are a coalition of concerned taxpayers, residential and ranch landowners, and neighboring community members affected by the proposed Pronghorn H2 project. We are deeply concerned by the actions of state and county officials, whose apparent prioritization of rapid entry into the renewable energy sector has come at the expense of public trust, environmental stewardship, and economic accountability. The decision-making process thus far reflects a troubling willingness to advance large-scale industrial development without fully considering the long-term consequences for local residents, natural resources, and the broader public interest.